<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Making airport messages easier to understand</title>
	<atom:link href="http://qubahq.com/2009/02/making-airport-announcements-easy-to-understand/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://qubahq.com/2009/02/making-airport-announcements-easy-to-understand/</link>
	<description>The public web space of Quba Michalski</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:52:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quba Michalski</title>
		<link>http://qubahq.com/2009/02/making-airport-announcements-easy-to-understand/comment-page-1/#comment-666</link>
		<dc:creator>Quba Michalski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 18:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qubahq.com/?p=18#comment-666</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Eddie&lt;/strong&gt;
I agree, the method could be used in multiple applications. Why I concentrated on a four-digit system is because of the international flight code standard which lists two letters and four digits.

For 2 or 3 digit numbers the same recording principles would still be valid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Eddie</strong><br />
I agree, the method could be used in multiple applications. Why I concentrated on a four-digit system is because of the international flight code standard which lists two letters and four digits.</p>
<p>For 2 or 3 digit numbers the same recording principles would still be valid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eddie</title>
		<link>http://qubahq.com/2009/02/making-airport-announcements-easy-to-understand/comment-page-1/#comment-665</link>
		<dc:creator>Eddie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 18:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qubahq.com/?p=18#comment-665</guid>
		<description>Interesting theory, but isn&#039;t it much more interesting if the computer good break up the number in 2-or 3 digit-numbers and then pronounce them. 
123456789 will then be pronounced as 123-456-789 etc... This shouldn&#039;t be impossible and even the recording is doable (0-999).

Greetings Eddie 

maybe my English is a little bit poor, I am from Holland and not used to writing in English.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting theory, but isn&#8217;t it much more interesting if the computer good break up the number in 2-or 3 digit-numbers and then pronounce them.<br />
123456789 will then be pronounced as 123-456-789 etc&#8230; This shouldn&#8217;t be impossible and even the recording is doable (0-999).</p>
<p>Greetings Eddie </p>
<p>maybe my English is a little bit poor, I am from Holland and not used to writing in English.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

